Archive for January, 2009

Lesson learned from a supermarket

customer focussed, library service No Comments »
Tesco Supermarket,Northampton UK

Tesco Supermarket,Northampton UK

My local supermarket has just added an extension to its store and done some renovations to the rest of the store.  One of those renovations was to change the express checkout area, increasing it from 2 to 4 checkouts.  However, with the increase, came a change in how they were accessed.  The new system required you to line up at one of the open checkouts, which depending on time of day etc, was usually between 2 and 4.

However, this new process was not accepted with delight by either staff or customers.  The majority of people were well aware of the potential unfairness of the situation, in that you could be served slower if you happened to choose the wrong queue.  It happened fairly quickly that customers started going to back to a single queue, ignoring the signage and stepping up to be served as a checkout operator became available.

Staff, on behalf of the customers and the numerous comment they had already received, approached management about the issue, asking them to change it to a single queue, for fairer service.  The response was that such a change would cause unacceptable blockages of aisle space. (I don’t know if they were ignoring or were unaware that 4 queues were doing the same sort of thing anyway).

That could have been the end of it, but it wasn’t.  I’m not privy to what happened behind closed doors, I just know what I gleaned from the girls behind the counter.  Anyway, those wonderful girls started taking a survey of customers, asking their opinion of the new setup and what their preference would be for the arrangement. From what I saw when they asked me the questions, the overwhelming response was that customers didn’t like the new setup and would prefer single queue access.

A few weeks later, I walk into the supermarket and there is now a barrier and guide, for one queue leading into the express checkout area.

Customer Service on Day 357

Customer Service on Day 357

This hit me on so many levels. Firstly, the whole idea of fairness that both the staff and customers determined needed to be achieved.  Just reminded me that we live in a world with a vast majority of decent people and that moment I was happy to be a part of that larger community.

Second was that the supermarket staff knew their customers and were listening to what they were saying and tried to do something about it.  They took those concerns to management.  Unfortunately at that time, management weren’t listening.  So the staff went away and got the information they needed to support their claims for change.  I am both proud and amazed that someone would stand up for customer interests, which includes my own, like that. It may seem trivial, but it was important enough that staff took it to management, not once but twice.

Third was that management took note of this extra effort and the evidence they were given (even if it was on the second attempt) and took the action necessary to make both staff and customers happy.  I spoke to one staff after the change, who was both suprised, but also very pleased that they had listened and acted – very quickly once the decision was made.

So how does this translate to libraries?  Quite easily, as we are both about customer service.

Do we know our users well enough to know what they don’t like about our libraries or what they would like to happen in our libraries?  Is it more than just guessing at what we think they want? If we don’t know them well enough, why don’t we – we serve them every day?  Also if we don’t know, are we asking them and if not, why not?

If we know, are we telling our management and coming up with ideas for change?  If not, why not?  If we do tell and they don’t seem to be listening are we letting it go, giving lame excuses or are we going to find the information that will help change their minds? I know that there have been times that I have made those lame excuses, when instead I should be fighting for what I know our users want or don’t want. My local supermarket has taught me that it can work.

It can be trivial or it can be major.  But if we are not listening to our customers and what they want and doing what we can to provide it, then we are not really serving them, are we? I know I’ll be trying to do better in future and really keeping my ears and eyes open to what our users want, then communicating it to the people who can make the difference.

If you have any, I would love to hear your stories of where staff have won through to change things in your library, because it was what your users wanted.

My new perspective on reading

about me, reader development, reading 2 Comments »
A library made of books

A library made of books

A librarian blogging about reading – how unusual!  Only joking of course.  Amazingly, I have had the subject of reading pottering around my head for just about forever, but it has come to the fore a bit more recently due to several insightful items I have read and also more forcefully due to a personal revelation.

First the reading. This blog post began with a blog post by Kathryn Greenhill at Librarians Matter.  In Our brand is books. Then what? she wrote about how users see libraries as being about books, but then moved on to the more interesting notion of book lovers and book readers, where they sit in the hierarchy of libraries and the new models that are coming out in publishing.  Well worth a read.  What I got out of it, was the revolution that is beginning to really happen with reading, but not of the printed book type (although there is still plenty of that happening, I am pleased to say).  More on that shortly.

My introspection was further fuelled by Walt Crawford in Cites and Insights December 2008.  The perspective in that issue, Writing about Reading, he also wrote about the To Read or not to Read report which came out in 2007. To summarise, the report claims that Americans are reading less.  Walt takes to it with enthusiasm, pointing out several inconsistencies in it, which are well worth reading.  However, the thing I picked up on was that the proposed definition of reading, according to the report, was books, although it could be taken to be narrowly defined to reading literary books.

Cat reading online news

Cat reading online news

Then in parallel, but not unrelated, came an article on The Inside Story – “The bad news” which outlined that the traditional Australian news consumers are changing, away from newspapers and even television to a certain extent.  A greater proportion of Australian news consumers are now getting what they need from the internet.  Some of this is general news sites, some of this is the actual reading of newspapers online.

So it seems that reading is changing.  I have no problem with that.  My public library has increasing statistics and not just for the always popular CD and DVD collections.  Magazines and graphic novels are high turnover items and fiction and non-fiction items continue to be well used.  Our library now has 4 blogs and we are building a good following on each of those as well.

But do we still define reading as reading of print exclusively?  I am a long-time librarian and have only just realised that to a certain extent I still did.  I have been reading blogs for quite some time, but usually printed out the articles I wanted and read them away from the computer, which only reinforced that assumption, incorrect as it is.

Even with the introduction of e-books in various forms, with a wide range of content and available through a growing number of digital devices, I did not really think about reading any great amount of content online as either possible, or even reading.

Until now.  Towards the end of last year, I discovered fan fiction.  I know its been around for decades, almost as long as the internet, but it was only then that I found something of interest to me.  Amazingly, I have also discovered, to my amazement and delight, that not only can there be good fan fiction to read (and thanks to all those amazing people out there writing it), but that I can spend hours and hours (if I let myself and can get away with it), sitting at my computer and reading and enjoying the stories on my LCD screen. (PS. Fan-fiction is “stories about characters or settings written by fans of the original work, rather than by the original creator”. Wikipedia)

I have been amazed all the more, because I automatically thought that my eyes would tire, I would get eyestrain etc, but in fact have not experienced any of the symptoms I expected to experience from even longer sessions on the computer. And its not only me.  I have been hearing and reading stories from people who are quite happy and comfortable reading quite lengthy tomes on their iPhones, Blackberrys, mobile phones, computers and more.

Readers

Readers

So my perspective on reading has changed from just reading printed text on paper (in some form).  Reading for me, now that I have finally realised it, is carrier neutral and I will read what I choose to, because I choose to, regardless of the format.

OK, so poke me and say Duh for me finally coming to that grand realisation.  But its been more than that to me, its also started a whole train of thought with reading and libraries as well.

Libraries in the last decade, but definitely in recent years, have been placing more of an emphasis on reader development – being the work of librarians and other professionals “designed to encourage reading and deepen the enjoyment of individual readers”. Wikipedia.  This has taken many forms, from websites to booklists, to displays, subject oriented newsletters and so much more.  Two of our library blogs have this aim in mind and are focussed on news, reviews and more, much related to reading books.  So I am all for it.

However, the question that arises for me now, is how can libraries be involved in reader development, for things that aren’t in their collections and particularly for those things that people don’t need libraries to access?  We can provide e-books for their digitial devices, although that is still in its infancy, however at this time reader development is about encouraging reading of the items in our library’s collections.  What about all the online content that will never be a part of a library collection?

Should reader development only be about encouraging readership using the items we already have?  Or can libraries expand reader development to things like fan fiction, which is only generally available online? Should the focus be on the content, or more on the reader, more of whom are becoming more comfortable reading online and are finding what they want to read there? And if it is the latter, how do we help our readers to find what they will enjoy reading online?  That is my big question and the breadth of it and all its implications is only just starting to hit me.

Would love to hear your thoughts on this and whether digital reading is the same for you now as it is for me and many others.

Happy New Year in reading, whatever its format!

PS. And that’s even going anywhere near the whole issue of audio books, lol!